4.3 Article

Prognosis after recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation: predictors for successful treatment and survival

Journal

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 1156-1163

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12644

Keywords

chemotherapy; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; nutrition; prognostic nutritional index; recurrence; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are no established prognostic factors or standardized therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence in liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to investigate impact of underlying patient condition on treatment and outcomes of recurrence of HCC after LT. The medical records of 268 LT patients with HCC were evaluated. Potential prognostic factors for survival after recurrence were evaluated, including recurrent tumor characteristics, medical/radiological/surgical therapies for recurrence, and an inflammatory marker (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio). Laboratory tests at recurrence, including albumin, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), prognostic nutritional index (PNI: ALC(/mu L) 9 0.005 + Albumin(g/dL) 9 10), were evaluated as surrogate markers for underlying patient conditions. A total of 51 (19%) patients developed HCC recurrence. The use of sirolimus and sorafenib significantly improved outcome (p = 0.007 and 0.04), and better nutritional status (PNI = 40) enhanced their efficacy. On multivariate analysis, low ALC (< 500/mu L) and albumin (< 2.8 g/L) remained independent prognostic factors (p = 0.03 and 0.02; hazard ratio = 3.61 [Ref. > 1000/mu L] and 4.97 [Ref. > 3.5 g/dL], respectively). Low PNI (< 40) showed significantly lower survival rate after adjusting the risk (p = 0.006, hazard ratio = 3.29). Underlying patient conditions and nutritional status, represented by ALC and albumin, are important to successful cancer treatment and strong prognostic markers for survival after HCC recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available