4.3 Article

A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Multiple Regions Associated with Head Size in Catfish

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 3389-3398

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.032201

Keywords

head size; GWAS; QTL; fish; hybrid; GenPred; shared data resources; genomic selection

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive grant from the USDA (US Department of Agriculture) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2015-67015-22975]
  2. USDA Aquaculture Research Program Competitive grant [2014-70007-22395]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skull morphology is fundamental to evolution and the biological adaptation of species to their environments. With aquaculture fish species, head size is also important for economic reasons because it has a direct impact on fillet yield. However, little is known about the underlying genetic basis of head size. Catfish is the primary aquaculture species in the United States. In this study, we performed a genome-wide association study using the catfish 250K SNP array with backcross hybrid catfish to map the QTL for head size (head length, head width, and head depth). One significantly associated region on linkage group (LG) 7 was identified for head length. In addition, LGs 7, 9, and 16 contain suggestively associated regions for head length. For head width, significantly associated regions were found on LG9, and additional suggestively associated regions were identified on LGs 5 and 7. No region was found associated with head depth. Head size genetic loci were mapped in catfish to genomic regions with candidate genes involved in bone development. Comparative analysis indicated that homologs of several candidate genes are also involved in skull morphology in various other species ranging from amphibian to mammalian species, suggesting possible evolutionary conservation of those genes in the control of skull morphologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available