4.7 Review

Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning in Vegetation StudiesA Review of Point Cloud and Waveform Features for Tree Species Classification

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f7090198

Keywords

LiDAR; airborne laser scanning; full-waveform; vegetation; tree species; point cloud features; waveform features; classification

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Arts (MWK), Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany [FKZ 1222 TG 87]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  3. Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanning has become readily available and established for vegetation studies in the fields of forestry, agriculture and urban studies. Independent of the field of application and the derived final product, each study uses features to classify a target object and to assess its characteristics (e.g., tree species). These laser scanning features describe an observable characteristic of the returned laser signal (e.g., signal amplitude) or a quantity of an object (e.g., height-width ratio of the tree crown). In particular, studies dealing with tree species classification apply a variety of such features as input. However, an extensive overview, categorization and comparison of features from full-waveform airborne laser scanning and how they relate to specific tree species are still missing. This review identifies frequently used full-waveform airborne laser scanning-based point cloud and waveform features for tree species classification and compares the applied features and their characteristics for specific tree species detection. Furthermore, limiting and influencing factors on feature characteristics and tree classification are discussed with respect to vegetation structure, data acquisition and processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available