Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: a cluster-controlled feasibility study
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: a cluster-controlled feasibility study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ Open
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages e011207
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2016-04-19
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011207
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Supporting communication for people with aphasia in stroke rehabilitation: transfer of training in a multidisciplinary stroke team
- (2015) Simon Horton et al. APHASIOLOGY
- Toward an evidence-based patient-provider communication in rehabilitation: linking communication elements to better rehabilitation outcomes
- (2015) Tiago Silva Jesus et al. CLINICAL REHABILITATION
- Overcoming practical challenges to conducting clinical research in the inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting
- (2015) Grace B. Campbell et al. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
- Explaining high and low performers in complex intervention trials: a new model based on diffusion of innovations theory
- (2015) Heather McMullen et al. Trials
- Implementation of supported conversation for communication between nursing staff and in-hospital patients with aphasia
- (2014) Lise R. Jensen et al. APHASIOLOGY
- “That really shouldn't have happened”: People with aphasia and their spouses narrate adverse events in hospital
- (2013) Bronwyn Hemsley et al. APHASIOLOGY
- Representation of People with Aphasia in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acute Stroke Interventions
- (2013) Myzoon Ali et al. International Journal of Stroke
- Bridges Self-Management Program for People with Stroke in the Community: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2013) Suzanne McKenna et al. International Journal of Stroke
- Lessons Learned in Recruitment and Retention of Stroke Survivors
- (2012) Niloufar Hadidi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING
- Computer Therapy Compared With Usual Care for People With Long-Standing Aphasia Poststroke
- (2012) Rebecca Palmer et al. STROKE
- Questions asked and answered in pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trials
- (2011) Milensu Shanyinde et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Very Early Poststroke Aphasia Therapy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial
- (2011) Erin Godecke et al. International Journal of Stroke
- Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales
- (2010) Leanne Togher et al. APHASIOLOGY
- Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: A Systematic Review
- (2010) Nina Simmons-Mackie et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Very Early Rehabilitation or Intensive Telemetry after Stroke: A Pilot Randomised Trial
- (2010) Peter Langhorne et al. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
- Focus on communication: increasing the opportunity for successful staff-patient interactions
- (2010) Kathy McGilton et al. International Journal of Older People Nursing
- Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population
- (2009) Katerina Hilari et al. CLINICAL REHABILITATION
- Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study
- (2009) Monica Taljaard et al. Trials
- The Communication Partner Scheme: A project to develop long‐term, low‐cost access to conversation for people living with aphasia
- (2008) Sally McVicker et al. APHASIOLOGY
- Counting what counts: A framework for capturing real‐life outcomes of aphasia intervention
- (2008) Aura Kagan et al. APHASIOLOGY
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
- (2008) Peter Craig et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started