4.7 Article

In-Silico Analysis and Implementation of a Multicellular Feedback Control Strategy in a Synthetic Bacterial Consortium

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 507-517

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00220

Keywords

synthetic biology; E. coli; synthetic microbial consortia; feedback control; gene networks; mathematical modeling

Funding

  1. BrisSynBio, a BBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre [BB/L01386X/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L01386X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/L01386X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Living organisms employ endogenous negative feedback loops to maintain homeostasis despite environmental fluctuations. A pressing open challenge in Synthetic Biology is to design and implement synthetic circuits to control host cells' behavior, in order to regulate and maintain desired conditions. To cope with the high degree of circuit complexity required to accomplish this task and the intrinsic modularity of classical control schemes, we suggest the implementation of synthetic endogenous feedback loops across more than one cell population. The distribution of the sensing, computation, and actuation functions required to achieve regulation across different cell populations within a consortium allows the genetic engineering in a particular cell to be reduced, increases the robustness, and makes it possible to reuse the synthesized modules for different control applications. Here, we analyze, in-silico, the design of a synthetic feedback controller implemented across two cell populations in a consortium. We study the effects of distributing the various functions required to build a control system across two populations, prove the robustness and modularity of the strategy described, and provide a computational proof-of-concept of its feasibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available