4.5 Article

Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German Energiewende

Journal

UTILITIES POLICY
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 206-209

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2014.07.005

Keywords

Energy policy; Energy transition; Infrastructural planning; Public engagement; Siting; Governance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The German Energiewende (Energy Transition) poses major challenges to all parties involved. Public participation can contribute to the understanding of these challenges and their positive resolution. It is not suitable, however, to expect public acceptance for predetermined solutions. Participation presupposes openness about options. If this does not exist, one can resort to methods of communication that attempt to convince affected citizens of the necessity of adopting a planned measure. Yet if there is room for choosing among options, participation may create a foundation for broad acceptance of a jointly determined solution to pressing problems. Participative procedures that follow the model of analytic deliberative discourse, by integrating scientific expertise with ethical and moral consideration, are particularly promising. A forward -looking model is drawn from the use of both online and traditional face-to-face methods of interaction, combining the advantages of both methods. An inclusive planning culture based on cooperation and integration is a promising way to achieve fair and effective implementation of the Energiewende. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives

Ortwin Renn, Manfred Laubichler, Klaus Lucas, Wolfgang Kroger, Jochen Schanze, Roland W. Scholz, Pia-Johanna Schweizer

Summary: This article addresses the challenges of systemic risks and highlights the importance of interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral perspectives in understanding and governing these risks. It emphasizes the need for integrating complexity modeling tools with empirical data and evidence-based insights to provide effective governance advice. The article also suggests assessing systemic risks through multiple indicators and diverse scenarios. Lastly, it emphasizes the necessity of interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral cooperation, close monitoring, and engagement of scientists, regulators, and stakeholders in the governance of systemic risks.

RISK ANALYSIS (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Systemic Risk: The Threat to Societal Diversity and Coherence

Ortwin Renn, Klaus Lucas

Summary: Insights from complexity science can be applied to analyze social processes, including the structure of social risks. The contribution of self-organization, often underestimated in social science theories, plays a crucial role in the crises facing modern democracy.

RISK ANALYSIS (2022)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Prologue: The Brave New World of Social Sciences in Interdisciplinary Risk Research

Andreas Klinke, Ortwin Renn, Robert Goble

RISK ANALYSIS (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

The opportunities and risks of digitalisation for sustainable development: a systemic perspective

Ortwin Renn, Grischa Beier, Pia-Johanna Schweizer

Summary: Digitalization can drive sustainable transformation in society and industry, but it also comes with risks. To ensure its sustainable success, a systemic risk-benefit perspective is needed, along with a co-design process for developing a governance structure.

GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Risk Researchers' Views About the Goal of Trying to Ensure Policymakers Consider Scientific Evidence

John C. Besley, Pia-Johanna Schweizer

Summary: A survey of a scientific society's members reveals substantial support for the pursuit of a communication goal to ensure policymakers consider scientific evidence. Support for this goal is driven by ethical beliefs, personal satisfaction, and the belief in the society's positive impact on society. Normative beliefs and organizational efficacy do not significantly predict goal support.

RISK ANALYSIS (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Social Perception of Systemic Risks

Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Robert Goble, Ortwin Renn

Summary: The article distinguishes between conventional risks and systemic risks, highlighting the characteristics and challenges posed by systemic risks. It introduces the application and extension of the social amplification of risk framework, identifies practical tools for assessing the significance of perceptions for systemic risks, and discusses governance strategies for systemic risks.

RISK ANALYSIS (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Socio-metabolic risk and tipping points on islands

Simron J. Singh, Tailin Huang, Nidhi Nagabhatla, Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Matthew Eckelman, Jasper Verschuur, Reshma Soman

Summary: This paper discusses the vulnerability of small islands from the perspective of socio-metabolic risk (SMR), highlighting the impact of material stocks and flows on SMR and proposing effective leverage points and adaptation strategies for building system resilience on small islands.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2022)

Editorial Material Environmental Sciences

Thirty years of GAIA: a constant in a fast-changing world

Helga Weisz, Christoph Kueffer, Ortwin Renn, Bernhard Schmid, Patrick Wager

GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY (2022)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Introduction to Special Series

Pia-Johanna Schweizer, Ortwin Renn

RISK ANALYSIS (2022)

Editorial Material Environmental Sciences

The crisis in Ukraine: another missed opportunity for building a more sustainable economic paradigm

Rainer Quitzow, Ortwin Renn, Yana Zabanova

Summary: Economic disruptions caused by the war in Ukraine provide insights into how climate change may threaten global supply chains in the future. The EU is addressing strategic vulnerabilities in fossil fuel supply while maintaining its climate ambition. However, more far-reaching changes are urgently needed to address the root causes of the current crisis.

GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Will short-term behavior changes during the COVID-19 crisis evolve into low- carbon practices?

Ortwin Renn, Anita Engels, Birgit Mack, Sophia Becker, Christina Camier

Summary: During the COVID-19 crisis, people made behavioral adaptations to temporarily reduce their individual carbon footprints. This paper summarizes existing knowledge on behavior change from psychology and sociology, and provides an overview of preliminary findings from empirical studies conducted so far. The focus is on changes in mobility and work routines in Germany, which may also provide insights for other countries.

GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY (2022)

No Data Available