4.7 Article

Generating trunk neural crest from human pluripotent stem cells

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep19727

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [U01U01CA176287, P30CA82103, R01NS088355, R01CA102321, R01DE024157, U01HL099997, P01HL089707, R01HL060664]
  2. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation
  3. Katie Dougherty Foundation
  4. Ross K. MacNeill Foundation
  5. Samuel G. Waxman Foundation
  6. CureSearch Grand Challenge Award
  7. American Cancer Society [PF-13-295-01-TBG]
  8. Swedish Brain Tumor Foundation
  9. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neural crest cells (NCC) are stem cells that generate different lineages, including neuroendocrine, melanocytic, cartilage, and bone. The differentiation potential of NCC varies according to the level from which cells emerge along the neural tube. For example, only anterior cranial NCC form craniofacial bone, whereas solely posterior trunk NCC contribute to sympathoadrenal cells. Importantly, the isolation of human fetal NCC carries ethical and scientific challenges, as NCC induction typically occur before pregnancy is detectable. As a result, current knowledge of NCC biology derives primarily from non-human organisms. Important differences between human and non-human NCC, such as expression of HNK1 in human but not mouse NCC, suggest a need to study human NCC directly. Here, we demonstrate that current protocols to differentiate human pluripotent stem cells (PSC) to NCC are biased toward cranial NCC. Addition of retinoic acid drove trunk-related markers and HOX genes characteristic of a posterior identity. Subsequent treatment with bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) enhanced differentiation to sympathoadrenal cells. Our approach provides methodology for detailed studies of human NCC, and clarifies roles for retinoids and BMPs in the differentiation of human PSC to trunk NCC and to sympathoadrenal lineages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available