4.6 Article

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Anatase and Rutile TiO2 Thin Films on CHO-K1 Cells in Vitro

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma9080619

Keywords

biocompatibility; sensors; cytotoxicity; titanium; titanium dioxide; MTT

Funding

  1. Secretaria de Educacion Publica (SEP) Programa de Mejoramiento del Posgrado (PROMEP) posdoctoral grant [DSA/103.5/14/5782]
  2. Centro Universitario de Vinculacion y Transferencia de Tecnologia de la Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla (BUAP) [DITCo32, DITCo 2016-9]
  3. National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) [229866]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin films on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells was evaluated after 24, 48 and 72 h of culture. The TiO2 thin films were deposited using direct current magnetron sputtering. These films were post-deposition annealed at different temperatures (300, 500 and 800 degrees C) toward the anatase to rutile phase transformation. The root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness of TiO2 films went from 2.8 to 8.08 nm when the annealing temperature was increased from 300 to 800 degrees C. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) results showed that the TiO2 films' thickness values fell within the nanometer range (290-310 nm). Based on the results of the tetrazolium dye and trypan blue assays, we found that TiO2 thin films showed no cytotoxicity after the aforementioned culture times at which cell viability was greater than 98%. Independently of the annealing temperature of the TiO2 thin films, the number of CHO-K1 cells on the control substrate and on all TiO2 thin films was greater after 48 or 72 h than it was after 24 h; the highest cell survival rate was observed in TiO2 films annealed at 800 degrees C. These results indicate that TiO2 thin films do not affect mitochondrial function and proliferation of CHO-K1 cells, and back up the use of TiO2 thin films in biomedical science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available