4.6 Article

Effects of robotic-locomotor training on stretch reflex function and muscular properties in individuals with spinal cord injury

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue 5, Pages 997-1006

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.010

Keywords

Locomotor training; Reflex; Spasticity; Ankle; Spinal cord injury; Gait rehabilitation

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R01HD059895]
  2. Craig H. Neilsen Foundation [82676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We sought to determine the therapeutic effect of robotic-assisted step training (RAST) on neuromuscular abnormalities associated with spasticity by characterization of their recovery patterns in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Twenty-three motor-incomplete SCI subjects received one-hour RAST sessions three times per week for 4 weeks, while an SCI control group received no training. Neuromuscular properties were assessed using ankle perturbations prior to and during the training, and a system-identification technique quantified stretch reflex and intrinsic stiffness magnitude and modulation with joint position. Growth-mixture modeling classified subjects based on similar intrinsic and reflex recovery patterns. Results: All recovery classes in the RAST group presented significant (p < 0.05) reductions in intrinsic and reflex stiffness magnitude and modulation with position; the control group presented no changes over time. Subjects with larger baseline abnormalities exhibited larger reductions, and over longer training periods. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that RAST can effectively reduce neuromuscular abnormalities, with greater improvements for subjects with higher baseline abnormalities. Significance: Our findings suggest, in addition to its primary goal of improving locomotor patterns, RAST can also reduce neuromuscular abnormalities associated with spasticity. These findings also demonstrate that these techniques can be used to characterize neuromuscular recovery patterns in response to various types of interventions. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available