4.4 Article

The American College of Rheumatology Provisional Composite Response Index for Clinical Trials in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

Journal

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 167-178

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22804

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH (National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) [U01-AR-055057, K24-AR-063120]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Clinician Scientist Award)
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Cytori
  5. EMD Serono
  6. Genkyotex
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Gilead
  9. Medac
  10. Sanofi-Aventis
  11. Actelion
  12. Genentech/Roche
  13. United Therapeutics
  14. Pfizer
  15. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  16. Biogen Idec
  17. FibroGen
  18. Novartis
  19. Celgene
  20. Bayer
  21. DART
  22. InterMune
  23. Sigma Tau
  24. ChemoCentryx
  25. Sanofi
  26. Medtelligence
  27. CSL Behring
  28. Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme
  29. Medimmune
  30. Behring
  31. Inventiva
  32. Sanofi/Genzyme
  33. Servier
  34. UCB
  35. Roche
  36. Ergonex
  37. United BioSource
  38. Biovitrium
  39. MSD
  40. AbbVie
  41. Amgen
  42. Janssen
  43. Versus Arthritis [20719] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveEarly diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is characterized by rapid changes in the skin and internal organs. The objective of this study was to develop a composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS) for use in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MethodsWe developed 150 paper patient profiles with standardized clinical outcome elements (core set items) using patients with dcSSc. Forty scleroderma experts rated 20 patient profiles each and assessed whether each patient had improved or not improved over a period of 1 year. Using the profiles for which raters had reached a consensus on whether the patients were improved versus not improved (79% of the profiles examined), we fit logistic regression models in which the binary outcome referred to whether the patient was improved or not, and the changes in the core set items from baseline to followup were entered as covariates. We tested the final index in a previously completed RCT. ResultsSixteen of 31 core items were included in the patient profiles after a consensus meeting and review of test characteristics of patient-level data. In the logistic regression model in which the included core set items were change over 1 year in the modified Rodnan skin thickness score, the forced vital capacity, the patient and physician global assessments, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index, sensitivity was 0.982 (95% confidence interval 0.982-0.983) and specificity was 0.931 (95% confidence interval 0.930-0.932), and the model with these 5 items had the highest face validity. Subjects with a significant worsening of renal or cardiopulmonary involvement were classified as not improved, regardless of improvements in other core items. With use of the index, the effect of methotrexate could be differentiated from the effect of placebo in a 1-year RCT (P=0.02). ConclusionWe have developed a CRISS that is appropriate for use as an outcome assessment in RCTs of early dcSSc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available