4.6 Article

Hepatic resection provided long-term survival for patients with intermediate and advanced-stage resectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0811-y

Keywords

Hepatocellular; Hepatic resection; Prognosis; Large; Multinodular

Funding

  1. Chinese State Key Project for Basic Research (973) [2014CBA02001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hepatic resection has the highest local controllability that results in long-term survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the role of hepatic resection in selected patients of intermediate and advanced stage. Methods: Clinical, pathological, and outcome data of 542 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed from a single center. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Postoperative prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 89.0, 64.3, and 53.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 72.2, 44.5, and 34.2 %, respectively. Preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level >400 ng/mL, macroscopic vascular invasion, microscopic portal vein thrombosis, multiple tumor nodules, and the largest tumor size >5 cm were significantly correlated with overall survival. When these clinical risk factors were used in a postoperative staging system, assigning one point for each factor, the total score was precisely predictive of long-term survival. For patients with surgery plus adjuvant TACE (transarterial chemoembolization), the median overall survival was 56 months (range 1-110 months) and the 5-year OS rate was 48.5 %. Conclusions: Hepatic resection is efficient and safe for HCC patients of intermediate and advanced stage. The adjuvant TACE should be recommended for HCC patients with poor risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available