4.6 Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma mouse models: Hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocarcinogenesis and haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 300-325

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.300

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Mouse models; Hepatitis B virus; Haploinsufficiency; Tumor suppressor genes

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan [NSC99-2628-B-010-001-MY3, MOST 103-2321-B-010-003, MOST 103-2633-H-010-001, MOST 103-2633-B-400-002, MOST104-3011-B-010-001]
  2. Ministry of Education, Aim for the Top University Plan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multifactorial and multistage pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has fascinated a wide spectrum of scientists for decades. While a number of major risk factors have been identified, their mechanistic roles in hepatocarcinogenesis still need to be elucidated. Many tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) have been identified as being involved in HCC. These TSGs can be classified into two groups depending on the situation with respect to allelic mutation/loss in the tumors: the recessive TSGs with two required mutated alleles and the haploinsufficient TSGs with one required mutated allele. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most important risk factors associated with HCC. Although mice cannot be infected with HBV due to the narrow host range of HBV and the lack of a proper receptor, one advantage of mouse models for HBV/HCC research is the numerous and powerful genetic tools that help investigate the phenotypic effects of viral proteins and allow the dissection of the dose-dependent action of TSGs. Here, we mainly focus on the application of mouse models in relation to HBV-associated HCC and on TSGs that act either in a recessive or in a haploinsufficient manner. Discoveries obtained using mouse models will have a great impact on HCC translational medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available