4.6 Article

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm: Key immunohistochemical profiles for differential diagnosis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 38, Pages 8596-8604

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8596

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumor; Pancreas; Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm; Immunohistochemistry; Diagnosis

Funding

  1. Scientific Research KAKENHI [23300362, 23659635]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659635] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM To reveal better diagnostic markers for differentiating neuroendocrine tumor (NET) from solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN), focusing primarily on immunohistochemical analysis. METHODS We reviewed 30 pancreatic surgical specimens of NET (24 cases) and SPN (6 cases). We carried out comprehensive immunohistochemical profiling using 9 markers: Synaptophysin, chromogranin A, pan-cytokeratin, E-cadherin, progesterone receptor, vimentin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, CD10, and beta-catenin. RESULTS E-cadherin staining in NETs, and nuclear labeling of beta-catenin in SPNs were the most sensitive and specific markers. Dot-like staining of chromogranin A might indicate the possibility of SPNs rather than NETs. The other six markers were not useful because their expression overlapped widely between NETs and SPNs. Moreover, two cases that had been initially diagnosed as NETs on the basis of their morphological features, demonstrated SPN-like immunohistochemical profiles. Careful diagnosis is crucial as we actually found two confusing cases showing disagreement between the tumor morphology and immunohistochemical profiles. CONCLUSION E-cadherin, chromogranin A, and beta-catenin were the most useful markers which should be employed for differentiating between NET and SPN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available