4.5 Article

Environmental fate and behavior of acesulfame in laboratory experiments

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 12, Pages 2832-2842

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.452

Keywords

drinking water; modelling; reactive transport; riverbank filtration; sorption; tracer

Funding

  1. Deutscher Verein des Gas- und Wasserfaches e.V. (DVGW) [W1/02/10-A, W1/02/10-B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acesulfame is a widely used artificial sweetener. It can be discharged into surface water by domestic wastewater due to its incomplete retention during wastewater treatment. Concentrations may reach up to 10 mu g/L for smaller rivers. State-of-the-art analysis allows the determination of acesulfame traces (0.01 mu g/L) and thus a potential tracking of the presence of wastewater in riverbank filtrate. To evaluate the behavior of acesulfame in the aquatic environment, biodegradation and sorption of acesulfame were tested. Batch experiments yielded low sorption for several soils (estimated solidwater distribution coefficient of acesulfame < 0.1 L/kg). Biodegradation in a fixed-bed reactor was not observed at environmental concentrations of 9 mu g/L in aqueous compost and soil extract (observation period 56 days). Only in diluted effluent of a wastewater treatment plant did biodegradation start, after 17 days of operation, and acesulfame completely fade, within 28 days. Flow-through column experiments indicated conservative behavior of acesulfame (recovery >83%) and long-term observations at different concentration levels yielded no biodegradation. Overall, laboratory experiments demonstrated a conservative behavior of acesulfame under conditions typical for riverbank filtration. However, there are hints for certain settings which favor an adaptation of the microbial community and facilitate a rapid biodegradation of acesulfame.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available