4.4 Article

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1) Virus in Feathers: Tropism and Pathology of Virus-Infected Feathers of Infected Ducks and Chickens

Journal

VETERINARY PATHOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 226-233

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0300985816666608

Keywords

H5N1; highly pathogenic avian influenza; skin; feathers; duck; chicken

Funding

  1. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) [AH/2004/040]
  2. ACIAR John Allwright Fellowships
  3. National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus causes high mortality of infected birds, with infection in multiple organs, including in feathers. Feathers have been proposed as samples for diagnosis of HPAI infection in birds, and this study is part of a broader investigation validating the use of feathers for diagnostic purposes. To understand and characterize the morphological basis for feather infection, sections from 7 different skin tracts of ducks and chickens infected with 3 different clades of H5N1 HPAI virus from Indonesia and Vietnam were examined histologically. Results showed that in ducks, lesions and viral antigen were mainly detected in the epidermis of feathers and follicles, whereas in chickens, they were mostly found in the dermis of these structures. Abundant viral antigen was found in nearly all the feathers examined from chickens, and there was no apparent difference between virus isolates or skin tracts in the proportion of feathers that were antigen positive. By immunohistochemistry, the majority of feathers from most skin tracts from ducks infected with a Vietnamese H5N1 HPAI virus contained abundant levels of viral antigen, while few feathers were antigen positive from ducks infected with 2 Indonesian viruses. These results support and inform the use of feathers for diagnostic detection of H5N1 HPAI virus in birds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available