4.5 Article

Active opioid use does not attenuate the humoral responses to inactivated influenza vaccine

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 1363-1369

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.051

Keywords

Influenza vaccination; Hemagglutination inhibition; Microneutralization; Heroin; Methadone; Opioid users

Funding

  1. pilot grant of the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (National Institute of Health) [UL1TR00457]
  2. CRIP (Center for Research in Influenza Pathogenesis), an NIAID [HHSN272201400008C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Influenza vaccination is recommended for vulnerable individuals, including active drug users, to prevent influenza complications and decrease influenza spread. Recent studies suggest that opioids negatively regulate immune responses in experimental models, but the extent to which opioid use will affect the humoral responses to influenza vaccine in humans is unknown. This information is critical in maximizing vaccination efforts. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in antibody response after influenza vaccination in heroin or methadone users compared to control subjects. Methods: We studied active heroin users, subjects on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and subjects that did not use any drugs before and I and 4 weeks after vaccination with trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). We measured hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization titers, and we compared geometric mean titers (GMT), and rates of seroprotection and seroconversion for each of the vaccine strains among the 3 groups of subjects. Results: Heroin users, subjects on MMT and non-user controls mount a similarly robust serologic response to TIV. GMT and rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were not significantly different among groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that opioid use do not significantly alter antibody responses to influenza vaccine supporting the vaccination effort in these populations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available