4.2 Article

Antitumor effect and mechanism of action of polysaccharides extracted from Polygonum perfoliatum L whole plant in human lung carcinoma A549 cell line

Journal

TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1243-1249

Publisher

PHARMACOTHERAPY GROUP
DOI: 10.4314/tjpr.v15i6.17

Keywords

Polygonum perfoliatum; Polysaccharides; Anti-tumor effect; Human lung carcinoma; Mitochondria-mediated apoptosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To optimize the extraction conditions of polysaccharides from Polygonum perfoliatum L. (PSDP) and to evaluate their anti-tumor activities on A549 cell line. Methods: Extraction of PSDP was optimized using Box-Behnken design (BBD). Three factors of response surface methodology (RSM) including extraction time, ratio of water to raw material and number of extractions were employed to optimize the yield of PSDP. The cytotoxic effect of PSDP on human lung carcinoma A549 cell line was evaluated in vivo, while its effects on expressions of caspase-3, caspase-9, Bcl-2 and Bax were determined by western blot assay. Result: BBD was significant and applicable to PSDP extraction. Based on the contour plots, response surface plots and variance analysis, it predicted that the optimum conditions for PSDP extraction were: 1.58 h (extraction time); 30.18 mL/g (ratio of water to raw material); and 2.02 (number of extractions). PSDP had significant inhibitory effect on the growth of A549 cells in a concentration-and time-dependent manner (p < 0.05). After treatment with PSDP, caspase-3, caspase-9 and Bax were significantly up-regulated (p < 0.05), whereas Bcl-2 was down-regulated, all concentration-dependently. Conclusion: RSM analysis is an appropriate method to optimize PSDP extraction. The results also indicate that PSDP has significant anti-tumor effect against A549 cells, most likely via inducing mitochondria-mediated apoptosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available