Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 24-35
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2016-11-04
DOI
10.1080/15376516.2016.1174761
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Unknown
- (2018) ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
- Comparison of In Silico Models for Prediction of Mutagenicity
- (2013) NAZANIN G. BAKHTYARI et al. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART C-ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS
- Use of in silico systems and expert knowledge for structure-based assessment of potentially mutagenic impurities
- (2013) Andreas Sutter et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- Potentially mutagenic impurities: Analysis of structural classes and carcinogenic potencies of chemical intermediates in pharmaceutical syntheses supports alternative methods to the default TTC for calculating safe levels of impurities
- (2013) Sheila M. Galloway et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities
- (2013) Antoni Valencia et al. TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
- Modeling of activity landscapes for drug discovery
- (2012) Jürgen Bajorath Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
- In silico methods combined with expert knowledge rule out mutagenic potential of pharmaceutical impurities: An industry survey
- (2012) Krista L. Dobo et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- Comparative Evaluation ofin SilicoSystems for Ames Test Mutagenicity Prediction: Scope and Limitations
- (2011) Alexander Hillebrecht et al. CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
- DNA-binding, DNA cleavage and cytotoxicity studies of two anthraquinone derivatives
- (2011) M.B. Gholivand et al. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY
- New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity
- (2010) Natalja Fjodorova et al. Chemistry Central Journal
- Sequence-Dependent Configurational Entropy Change of DNA upon Intercalation
- (2010) Michal Kolář et al. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
- SAR/QSAR methods in public health practice
- (2010) Eugene Demchuk et al. TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
- Docking Studies on DNA-Ligand Interactions: Building and Application of a Protocol To Identify the Binding Mode
- (2009) Clarisse G. Ricci et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity
- (2009) M. Kamber et al. MUTAGENESIS
- Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept—A comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity
- (2009) Lutz Müller et al. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
- DNA-binding drugs caught in action: the latest 3D pictures of drug-DNA complexes
- (2008) D. Roeland Boer et al. DALTON TRANSACTIONS
- Combined Use of MC4PC, MDL-QSAR, BioEpisteme, Leadscope PDM, and Derek for Windows Software to Achieve High-Performance, High-Confidence, Mode of Action–Based Predictions of Chemical Carcinogenesis in Rodents
- (2008) Edwin J. Matthews et al. TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
- Cytochrome P450 and Chemical Toxicology
- (2007) F. Peter Guengerich CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started