4.2 Article

Is Heparin Effective for the Controlled Delivery of High-Dose Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2?

Journal

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
Volume 22, Issue 9-10, Pages 801-817

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0537

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [A120850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 by heparin-contained biomaterials is advantageous for bone tissue regeneration using low-dose BMP-2. However, its effect with high-dose BMP-2 is still unclear and should be clarified considering the clinical use of a high dose of BMP-2 in spine and oral surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a heparin-conjugated collagen sponge (HCS) with high-dose BMP-2 delivery by investigating in vivo initial osteogenic regulation and bone healing over 12 weeks in comparison with that of an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS). The in vitro BMP-2 release profile in the HCS exhibited a lower burst followed by a sustained release of BMP-2, whereas that of the ACS showed an initial burst phase only. As a result of a lower burst, the HCS-BMP group showed higher expression of bone-forming/resorbing markers and enhanced activation of osteoclasts than the ACS-BMP group within the scaffold of defect after 7 days, which is presumed to be because of retention of relatively higher amounts of BMP-2. However, the surrounding calvariae were less resorbed in the HCS-BMP group, compared with the aggressive resorptive response in the ACS-BMP group. Microcomputed tomography and histology revealed that HCS-BMP guided more effective bone regeneration of central defect over time inducing minor ossification at the defect exterior, whereas ACS-BMP exhibited excessive ossification at the defect exterior. These results showed that HCS-mediated BMP-2 delivery at a high dose has advantages over ACS, including less early resorption of surrounding bone tissue and higher efficacy in compact bone regeneration over a longer period, highlighting a clinical feasibility of this technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available