4.2 Article

Intra-arterial catheter system to repeatedly deliver mesenchymal stem cells in a rat renal failure model

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 169-177

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-015-1161-8

Keywords

Intra-arterial; Mesenchymal stem cell therapy; Rat model

Funding

  1. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in renal failure is rarely used because of low rates of cell engraftment after systemic delivery. Repeated intra-arterial cell administration may improve results; however, no current delivery method permits repeated intra-arterial infusions in a rat model. In this study, we developed an intra-arterial delivery system for repeated stem cell infusion via the aorta, catheterizing the left femoral artery to the suprarenal aorta under fluoroscopic guidance in rats with adenosine-induced renal failure. First, we compared our intra-arterial catheter system (C group, n = 3) with tail vein injection (V group, n = 3) for engraftment efficacy, using mesenchymal stem cells from luciferase transgenic rats. Rats were infused with the cells and euthanized the following day; we performed cell-tracking experiments using a bioluminescence imaging system to assess the distribution of the infused cells. Second, we assessed the safety of the system over a 30-day period in a second group of six rats receiving infusions every 7 days. Cells infused through our delivery system efficiently engrafted into the kidney, compared with peripheral venous infusion. In five of the six rats in the safety study, the delivery system remained patent for at least 9 days (range, 9-24 days). Complications became evident only after 10 days. Our intra-arterial catheter system was effective in delivering cells to the kidney and permitted repeated injection of cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available