4.2 Article

The Perte-du-Rhne Formation, a new Cretaceous (Aptian-Cenomanian) lithostratigraphic unit in the Jura mountains (France and Switzerland)

Journal

SWISS JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 221-240

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00015-016-0220-9

Keywords

Jura mountains; Lithostratigraphy; Cretaceous; Aptian; Albian; Cenomanian

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_144459]
  2. University of Lausanne
  3. Swisstopo
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_144459] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the late Early Cretaceous, the Jura domain was occupied by a photozoan carbonate platform, summarised in the Vallorbe Formation. From the earliest Aptian to the Late Cenomanian, open marine heterozoan and detrital marl, carbonate, and sandstone (up to 40 m thick) accumulated on top of the former Urgonian platform, followed during the Late Cretaceous by pelagic chalk and limestone. At the end of the Early Cretaceous, sediment accumulation was interrupted by several emersions and consecutive drowning phases identified in the field by angular discontinuities, iron crusts, and phosphatic conglomerates. Such sedimentary succession is particularly well visible in the present Bellegarde-sur-Valserine Basin of the Ain Department (eastern France). Therefore, in agreement with the Swiss Committee of Stratigraphy, we introduced new lithostratigraphic units to cover the time from the Aptian to the Cenomanian in the Jura mountains based on the type section near the historical outcrop of the Perte-du-Rhne in the Bellegarde Basin. The new Perte-du-Rhne Formation is subdivided in a lower marly unit (Fulie Member), followed by a middle green sandstone unit with phosphatic conglomerates (Mussel Member), which is finally topped by a mica-rich sandstone unit (Poncin Member).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available