4.5 Review

Association of age-related macular degeneration and reticular macular disease with cardiovascular disease

Journal

SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 422-433

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.10.003

Keywords

age-related macular degeneration; age-related maculopathy; cardiovascular disease; coronary artery disease; reticular macular disease; reticular drusen; reticular pseudodrusen; subretinal drusenoid deposits

Categories

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of adult blindness in the developed world. Thus, major endeavors to understand the risk factors and pathogenesis of this disease have been undertaken. Reticular macular disease is a proposed subtype of age related macular degeneration correlating histologically with subretinal drusenoid deposits located between the retinal pigment epithelium and the inner segment ellipsoid zone. Reticular lesions are more prevalent in females and in older age groups and are associated with a higher mortality rate. Risk factors for developing age-related macular degeneration include hypertension, smoking, and angina. Several genes related to increased risk for age-related macular degeneration and reticular macular disease are also associated with cardiovascular disease. Better understanding of the clinical and genetic risk factors for age-related macular degeneration and reticular macular disease has led to the hypothesis that these eye diseases are systemic. A systemic origin may help to explain why reticular disease is diagnosed more frequently in females as males suffer cardiovascular mortality at an earlier age, before the age of diagnosis of reticular macular disease and age-related macular degeneration. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available