4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Liver regeneration after major liver hepatectomy: Impact of body mass index

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages 81-91

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.02.014

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Obese patients may present with metabolic abnormalities that impact liver regeneration. We sought to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on liver volume regeneration index (RI) and kinetic growth rate (KGR) among patients undergoing liver resection. Methods. The study included 102 patients undergoing major hepatectomy (>= 3 segments) between July 2004 and April 2015 and stratified the patients by preoperative BMI, number of segments resected, and postoperative remnant liver volume (REVp) to total liver volume ratio. Resected volume at operation was subtracted from total liver volume to calculate postoperative RLVp. RI was defined as the relative increase in RLV within 2 months [(RLV2m-REVp)/RLVp] and 7 months [(RLV7m-RLVp)/RLVP] postoperatively; KGR was calculated as RI divided by time postoperatively (weeks). Results. Median patient age was 59.6 years (interquartile range 48.1-68.7 years), and most patients were men (52.0%). Liver failure was associated with the KGR at 2 months (KGR(2m)) and was greater among patients with KGR(2m) <2.5 % per week (KGR <2.5 %, 18.5 % vs KGR >= 2.5 %, 4.6%; P =.04). Although RI and KGR within 2 and 7 months postoperatively were similar among all patients, after excluding patients with fibrosis, obese (0.42% per week) and overweight patients (0.29% per week) had lesser KGR(2-7m) compared with patients of normal BMI (0.82% per week; P <.05). Additionally, risk of a major complication was greatest among obese patients (normal weight, 8. 1% vs overweight, 12.9% vs obese, 29.4%; P =.04). Conclusion. BMI did not impact liver regeneration during the first 2 months. In contrast, KGR per week between 2 and 7 months postoperatively was less among overweight and obese patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available