4.3 Review

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial protection during estrogen replacement therapy: a clinical review

Journal

CLIMACTERIC
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 470-482

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2014.991302

Keywords

LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; ENDOMETRIAL PROTECTION; ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY; EFFICACY; SAFETY; MENSTRUAL BLEEDING PROFILE; MENOPAUSE

Funding

  1. Bayer HealthCare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is a well-established method of managing climacteric symptoms in women approaching the menopause, but it is associated with a significant risk of endometrial hyperplasia if unopposed by concomitant progestogen administration. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) offers a highly effective method of minimizing this risk and has additional benefits beyond endometrial protection. The LNG-IUS provides excellent contraception, which may still be necessary in perimenopausal women, and is suitable for women with underlying conditions that may preclude their use of estrogen-containing contraceptive methods. It can effectively manage bleeding problems through the transition from perimenopause into menopause, with many women developing amenorrhea. The LNG-IUS is well tolerated with a favorable safety profile, which generally mirrors that of women of reproductive age using it for contraception only. Moreover, the LNG-IUS plus ERT combination does not appear to be associated with clinically relevant effects on plasma lipids or other markers of cardiovascular risk. Women using the LNG-IUS plus ERT also experience improvements in quality of life, and adherence and continuation rates are high. This review will summarize the clinical evidence for the use of the LNG-IUS plus ERT in peri-and postmenopausal women and present the key attributes of this combined therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available