4.3 Article

The association between metabolic syndrome and pressure ulcers among individuals living with spinal cord injury

Journal

SPINAL CORD
Volume 54, Issue 11, Pages 967-972

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.53

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Community Living, NIDILRR [90RT5003, 90DP0004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and pressure ulcers (PrU), after controlling for demographic and injury characteristics, socioeconomic factors, health behaviors and fatigue among participants with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 350 participants with SCI from a hospital in the western region of the USA. Blood tests and physical examination were performed. Waist circumference, high-density cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure and fasting glucose were used to diagnose MetS according to Criteria for Clinical Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome defined by the American Heart Association. All other variables were self-reported. Three-stage multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the effects of three sequential sets of predictors, including demographic/injury, socio-environmental/behavioral and health factors, basing the order of analysis on the Theoretical Risk and Prevention Model. Results: The prevalence of PrU and MetS was 11.0% (n= 36) and 35.3% (n= 115), respectively. Ethnicity, smoking, alcohol consumption and MetS were statistically associated with PrU in the full model. Participants who were non-Hispanic (odds ratio (OR)= 10.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.46-30.65), smokers (OR= 2.69, 95% CI: 1.00-7.27) and drank over 30 drinks per month (OR= 5.26, 95% CI: 1.24-22.26) had greater odds of having a PrU compared with those who were Hispanic, non-smokers and non-drinkers, respectively. We also observed a positive association between MetS and PrU (ORMetS= 3.71, 95% CI: 1.45-9.52), even after controlling for all other factors. Conclusion: Participants who had MetS had higher odds of PrU than those without MetS after adjusting for multiple covariates. Unhealthy behaviors such as smoking and excess drinking were positively associated with PrU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available