4.0 Article

Feasibility of using Grindr™ to distribute HIV self-test kits to men who have sex with men in Los Angeles, California

Journal

SEXUAL HEALTH
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 389-392

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SH15236

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UCLA Center for HIV Identification, Prevention, and Treatment [5P30MH058107]
  2. UCLA Center for AIDS Research [5P30 AI028697]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Our study aimed to determine if Grindr (TM) is an effective means of reaching high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) for HIV testing. In Los Angeles (LA), Black and Latino MSM have the highest rate of HIV infection, and Black MSM in LA are four-fold more likely than white MSM to not know they are infected with HIV. Those MSM are also major users of social networking apps. Grindr (TM) was used to provide access to free HIV self-testing. Methods: Free HIV self-test kits were advertised on Grindr (TM) from 13 October to 11 November 2014, consisting of 300 000 banner ads and three broadcast messages targeting a high-risk HIV population in LA. Eligible participants, Black or Latino, MSM and who were aged >= 18 years of age, were invited to take a survey 2 weeks after test delivery. Results: The website received 4389 unique visitors and 333 test requests, of which 247 (74%) were requests for mailed tests, 58 (17%) were for vouchers and 28 (8%) were for vending machines. Of the 125 participants, 74% reported at least one episode of condomless anal intercourse in the past 3 months, 29% last tested for HIV over 1 year ago and 9% had never been tested. Conclusions: It was feasible to use Grindr (TM) to distribute HIV self-test kits. Users are willing to provide personal information in exchange for a free self-test and found self-tests acceptable and easy to use. HIV self-testing promotion through apps has a high potential to reach untested high-risk populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available