Protocol for a retrospective, controlled cohort study of the impact of a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research on the completeness of reporting study design and execution

Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement

(2015) Malcolm R. Macleod et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis

(2014) John P A Ioannidis et al.   LANCET

The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

(2014) Jennifer A. Hirst et al.   PLoS One

Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies

(2014) David Baker et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility

(2013)   NATURE

A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research

(2012) Story C. Landis et al.   NATURE

Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

(2012) C. Glenn Begley et al.   NATURE

Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

(2011) Florian Prinz et al.   NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY

Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research

(2010) Carol Kilkenny et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Empirical Evidence of Bias in the Design of Experimental Stroke Studies

(2008) Nicolas A. Crossley et al.   STROKE