4.7 Article

Non-target effects of repeated chlorothalonil application on soil nitrogen cycling: The key functional gene study

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 543, Issue -, Pages 636-643

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.053

Keywords

Chlorothalonil; Non-target effects; Nitrogen cycling; Functional gene

Funding

  1. Public Service Special Project of the Environmental Protection Ministry of China [201109018]
  2. Aspheric Enterprise Development Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China [2Y241150000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The widespread and increasing application of chlorothalonil (CTN) raises concerns about its non-target impacts, but little information is available on the effect of CTN on the key functional genes related to soil nitrogen (N) cycling, especially in the case of repeated applications. In the present study, a microcosm incubation was conducted to determine CTN residues and the impacts on the abundances of key functional genes related to N cycling after repeated CTN applications. The results demonstrated that repeated CTN applications at the recommended application rate and five times the recommended rate led to the accumulation of UN residue in soil at concentrations of 5.59 and 78.79 mg kg(-1), respectively, by the end of incubation. Real time PCR (RT-PCR) revealed that repeated CTN applications had negative effects on the chiA and aprA gene abundances. There were significantly negative correlations between CTN residues and abundances of AOA and AOB genes. In addition, the abundances of key functional genes involved in soil denitrification were declined by repeated CTN applications with the sole exception of the nosZ gene. This study suggests that repeated CTN applications could lead to the accumulation of CTN residue and generate somewhat inconsistent and erratic effects on the abundances of key functional genes related to soil N cycling. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available