4.7 Article

Groundwater flow and geochemical evolution in the Central Flinders Ranges, South Australia

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 572, Issue -, Pages 837-851

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.123

Keywords

Hydrochemistry; Stable isotopes; Groundwater flow; Recharge; Modelling; Flinders Ranges; Australia

Funding

  1. Goyder Institute for Water Research
  2. South Australian Arid Lands NRM Board
  3. Egyptian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical characteristics of water in the Oratunga Area, Central Flinders Ranges, South Australia have been used to evaluate and determine the processes controlling water chemistry in addition to the sources of ions. The isotopic analysis results show that the groundwater is mainly meteoric. Based on the rock and water chemistry, ionic ratios, hydrochemical facies and saturation indices, the chemical evolution has been studied. The chemistry of groundwater revealed two types of water. Thus, in high topographic areas, low TDS, bicarbonate and mixed water types are dominated and support a rapid and direct recharge. While in the low topographic areas, high TDS and chloride compositions are the most common attributed to the accumulation of ions and groundwater evolution. Analysis of the ion concentration, head data and saturation indices shows a compositional trend that can be studied as an evolutionary system. The ionic ratios and hydrogeochemical modelling using NETPATH was used to quantify and verify the different hydrochemical processes. The resulting data shows that calcite dissolution/precipitation and cation exchange reactions are the major processes affecting groundwater chemical evolution of the groundwater in the basin. This study has provided a basis for a better understanding of the hydrogeologic setting in areas of a little data. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available