4.7 Article

Impact of sediment particle size on biotransformation of 17β-estradiol and 17β-trenbolone

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 572, Issue -, Pages 207-215

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.004

Keywords

Estrogen; Androgen; Biotransformation; Sand fraction; Fine fraction

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0966850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil/sediment particle size has been reported to influence the sorption and bioavailability of steroid hormones in the environment. However, the impact of particle size on biotransformation has not been well elucidated. The present study investigated the dissipation of 17 beta-estradiol and 17 beta-trenbolone and the formation and degradation of the subsequent transformation products in different size fractions of a sandy and a silt loam sediment. The results showed that the decay of 17 beta-estradiol and 17 beta-trenbolone associated with fine particles followed a biphasic pattern with more rapid decay in the initial phase followed by a second phase with slower decay of the residues compared to their decay rates in the sand fraction. Estrone and trendione were detected as a primary biotransformation product for 17 beta-estradiol and 17 beta-trenbolone, respectively. The parent-to-product conversion ratios and the degradation rates of estrone and trendione varied among different size fractions, but no consistent correlation was observed between decay rates and sediment particle size. Estrone and trendione decayed in the whole sediments at rates not statistically different from those associated with the fine fractions. These results indicate that fine particles may play an important role in influencing the persistence of and the potential risk posed by steroid hormones in the aquatic systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available