4.7 Article

Soil amendment affects Cd uptake by wheat - are we underestimating the risks from chloride inputs?

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 554, Issue -, Pages 349-357

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.049

Keywords

Cadmium mobility; Chloride complexation; Circular economy; Human health; Nutrient recovery; Wastes

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas) [2010-1947]
  2. Swedish Farmers' Foundation for Agricultural Research (SLF) [0133033]
  3. Stiftelsen Svensk Vaxtnaringsforskning
  4. Scottish Government Rural Environment Science Analysis Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many parts of the world are investigating the efficacy of recycling nutrient resources to agriculture from different industry and domestic sectors as part of a more circular economy. The complex nature of recycled products as soil amendments coupled to the large diversity of soil types and their inherent properties make it difficult to optimize the benefits and minimize the risks from potentially toxic elements often present in recycled materials. Here we investigated how wheat grain cadmium (Cd) concentration was affected by soil amendments, namely human urine and biogas digestate compared to traditional farm manures and mineral fertilizers. We show that Cl- inadvertently added to soils with e.g. urine or biogas digestate strongly increased crop Cd concentrations, largely by mobilizing inherent soil Cd. This resulted in wheat grain Cd levels that could result in exceeding recommended WHO limits for dietary intake. This was evident even in soils with low inherent Cd content and when Cd inputs were low. The future of a circular economy that helps to underpin global food security needs to ensure that the effects of applying complex materials to different types of agricultural land are fully understood and do not jeopardize food safety. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available