4.7 Article

Toxic airborne S, PAH, and trace element legacy of the superhigh-organic-sulphur Rasa coal combustion: Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assessment of soil and ash

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 566, Issue -, Pages 306-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.096

Keywords

Sulphur pollution; Organic pollutants; PIXE; CCO cell line; Comet assay; Ecological risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the levels of sulphur, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and potentially toxic trace elements in soils surrounding the Plomin coal-fired power plant (Croatia). It used domestic superhigh-organic-sulphur Rasa coal from 1970 until 2000. Rasa coal was characterised by exceptionally high values of S, up to 14%, making the downwind southwest (SW) area surrounding the power plant a significant hotspot. The analytical results show that the SW soil locations are severely polluted with S (up to 4%), and PAHs (up to 13,535 ng/g), while moderately with Se (up to 6.8 mg/kg), and Cd (up to 4.7 mg/kg). The composition and distribution pattern of PAHs in the polluted soils indicate that their main source could be airborne unburnt coal particles. The atmospheric dispersion processes of SO2 and ash particles have influenced the composition and distribution patterns of sulphur and potentially toxic trace elements in studied soils, respectively. A possible adverse impact of analysed soil on the local karstic environment was evaluated by cytotoxic and genotoxic methods. The cytotoxicity effects of soil and ash water extracts on the channel catfish ovary (CCO) cell line were found to be statistically significant in the case of the most polluted soil and ash samples. However, the primary DNA-damaging potential of the most polluted soil samples on the CCO cells was found to be within acceptable boundaries. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available