4.1 Article

Short-term program of aerobic training prescribed using critical velocity is effective to improve metabolic profile in postmenopausal women

Journal

SCIENCE & SPORTS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 95-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scispo.2015.03.006

Keywords

Endurance training; Lipoproteins; Obesity; Menopausal women

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level - or Education - Personnel (Capes)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. -The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of an eight-week aerobic training prescribed by the critical velocity on metabolic profile. Methods. -The participants were divided into two groups: Aerobic Training (AT [n = 10]) and Control group (CG [n = 9]). Aerobic intensity was prescribed using critical velocity and the women exercised during eight weeks. The trunk body fat (TBF), body fat (BF) and fat-free mass were estimated using DXA. The total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-c), triacylglycerol and glucose were analyzed in a particular laboratory. Results. -After eight weeks, there were statistically significant differences between AT and CG in TBF (CG = 4.27 +/- 5.10 vs. AT = 3.13 +/- 4.65; P = 0.006), BF in kg (CG = 2.79 +/- 5.91 vs. AT = -2.75 +/- 3.01; P = 0.015) and percentage (CG = 1.83 +/- 3.67 vs. AT = -2.40 +/- 2.67; P = 0.010.), LDL-c levels (CG = 10.95 +/- 23.63 vs. AT= -11.96 +/- 22.00; P = 0.045) and a tendency in TC (GC = 9.00 +/- 15.59 vs. AT = 6.67 +/- 16.43; P = 0.052). Conclusion. -In summary, the present study suggests that even a short-term of aerobic training, prescribed using critical velocity, is effective in decreasing whole body fat, central adiposity and low-density lipoprotein -cholesterol in postmenopausal women. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available