4.3 Article

Follow-up of patients with ECL cell-derived tumours

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 11, Pages 1398-1405

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1169588

Keywords

ECL cell; gastrin; gastric carcinoids; somatostatin analogues

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To review the presentation, treatment and outcome of patients with type 1 gastric carcinoid tumours.Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and re-evaluated histopathological specimens of 26 patients with type 1 gastric carcinoids treated at a single tertiary referral centre from 1993 to 2013, with median time of follow-up 52.5 months (IQR 90.8).Results: Seven patients (27%) had single tumours and 19 patients (73%) multiple tumours at the time of diagnosis. The median number of tumours and median diameter of largest tumour were 2.5 (IQR 3.2) and 6.0mm (IQR 9.5) respectively. Median serum gastrin was 321.0pmol/l (IQR 604.0) and median serum chromogranin A 7.7nmol/l (IQR 5.3). Three patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and two developed metastases during follow-up. Patients with metastatic disease had larger primary tumours than the others (20.0mm (IQR 28.5) vs. 5.0mm (IQR 5.5), p=0.04). There was a positive correlation between age and tumour size (r=0.44, p=0.03) and between serum chromogranin A and serum gastrin at diagnosis (r=0.76, p=0.001). Patients were either treated with surgery (n=8 (31%)), a long-acting somatostatin analogue and/or gastrin receptor antagonist (n=10 (39%)) for a period of time, or were observed without treatment (n=8 (31%) with close endoscopic follow up.Conclusions: Although gastric carcinoids have an overall good prognosis, a significant proportion develops metastatic disease. As partial and total gastrectomy is associated with major side effects, treatment with long-acting a somatostatin analogue or gastrin antagonist should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available