4.3 Article

Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia area: a meta-analysis of random controlled trials

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages 1512-1519

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1216588

Keywords

Hepatocellular; transarterial; resectable; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We aimed to systematically evaluate the influence of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on long-term prognosis and perioperative safety.Materials and methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Wanfang, CNKI, VIP data were searched, combined with Manual Retrieval and Cited Reference Search to collect the published randomized controlled trial (RCT) about the influence of pre-TACE for curative resection of HCC. The searching cutoff date was 2016/02/25, all the data obtained were statistically analyzed using RevMan5.2 software recommended by Cochrane Collaboration.Results: A total of 5 RCT including 430 (pre-TACE group: 212, surgery alone group: 218) patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no difference between the 2 groups on overall survival (OS) rate [HR 1.25, 95%CI (0.92-1.68)], disease free survival (DFS) rate [HR 0.95 (0.76-1.19)], perioperative mortality rate [OR 0.70 (0.22-2.30)], or blood loss [SMD 0.07 (-0.14-0.29)], whereas the subgroup analysis revealed that pre-TACE would result in longer operation time [SMD 0.31 (0.06-0.57)], higher postoperative morbidity rate [OR 1.90 (1.02-3.53)] and combined resection rate of perihepatic organs [OR 5.46 (2.73-11.78)] in subgroup with mean tumor diameter>5cm.Conclusions: According to our study, pre-TACE treatment cannot improve the long-term prognosis of resectable HCC. With the growth of the tumor diameter, especially when it is over 5cm, it might add difficulties to surgery and affect the perioperative safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available