4.7 Article

Wave Propagation in Isotropic Media with Two Orthogonal Fracture Sets

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages 4033-4048

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-016-1084-z

Keywords

Fractures; Rock mechanics; Wave propagation; Geophysics

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Geosciences Research Program [DE-FG02-09ER16022]
  2. Geo-mathematical Imaging Group at Purdue University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orthogonal intersecting fracture sets form fracture networks that affect the hydraulic and mechanical integrity of a rock mass. Interpretation of elastic waves propagated through orthogonal fracture networks is complicated by guided modes that propagate along and between fractures, by multiple internal reflections, as well as by scattering from fracture intersections. The existence of some or all of these potentially overlapping modes depends on local stress fields that can preferentially close or open either one or both sets of fractures. In this study, an acoustic wave front imaging system was used to examine the effect of bi-axial loading conditions on acoustic wave propagation in isotropic media containing two orthogonal fracture sets. From the experimental data, orthogonal intersecting fracture sets support guided waves that depend on fracture spacing and fracture-specific stiffnesses. In addition, fracture intersections have stronger effects on propagating wave fronts than merely the superposition of the effects of two independent fractures because of energy partitioning among transmitted/reflected waves, scattered waves and guided modes. Interpretation of the properties of fractures or fracture sets from seismic measurements must consider non-uniform fracture stiffnesses within and among fracture sets, as well as considering the striking effects of fracture intersections on wave propagation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available