4.5 Article

Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients following cardiac arrest: A retrospective nested cohort study

Journal

RESUSCITATION
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 108-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.026

Keywords

Oxygen; Cardiac arrest; Mechanical ventilation; Mortality; Outcome; Intensive care

Funding

  1. Anaesthesia Intensive Care Trust Fund, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In mechanically ventilated (MV) cardiac arrest (CA) survivors admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) avoidance of hypoxia is considered crucial. However, avoidance of hyperoxia may also be important. A conservative approach to oxygen therapy may reduce exposure to both. Methods: We evaluated the introduction of conservative oxygen therapy (target SpO(2) 88-92% using the lowest FiO(2)) during MV for resuscitated CA patients admitted to the ICU. Results: We studied 912 arterial blood gas (ABG) datasets: 448 ABGs from 50 'conventional' and 464 ABGs from 50 'conservative' oxygen therapy patients. Compared to the conventional group, conservative group patients had significantly lower PaO2 values and FiO(2) exposure (p < 0.001, respectively); more received MV in a spontaneous ventilation mode (18% vs 2%; p = 0.001) and more were exposed to a FiO(2) of 0.21 (19 vs 0 patients, p = 0.001). Additionally, according to mean PaO2, more conservative group patients were classified as normoxaemic (36 vs 16 patients, p < 0.01) and fewer as hyperoxaemic (14 vs 33 patients, p < 0.01). Finally, ICU length of stay was significantly shorter for conservative group patients (p = 0.04). There was no difference in the proportion of survivors discharged from hospital with good neurological outcome (14/23 vs 12/22 patients, p = 0.67). Conclusions: Our findings provide preliminary support for the feasibility and physiological safety of conservative oxygen therapy in patients admitted to ICU for MV support after cardiac arrest (Trial registration, NCT01684124). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available