4.4 Article

Aggregate entropy scoring for quantifying activity across endpoints with irregular correlation structure

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 92-99

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.04.012

Keywords

Developmental neurotoxicology; Chemical biology; Morphology; Zebrafish; High throughput screening; ToxCast; Multiplexed assays

Funding

  1. NIEHS [R01 ES19604, R01 ES023788, P42 ES005948, P30 ES025128, RC4 ES019764 P30, P30 ES000210, P42 ES016465, 5T32ES007329]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) STAR [835168, 83579601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robust computational approaches are needed to characterize systems-level responses to chemical perturbations in environmental and clinical toxicology applications. Appropriate characterization of response presents a methodological challenge when dealing with diverse phenotypic endpoints measured using in vivo systems. In this article, we propose an information-theoretic method named Aggregate Entropy (AggE) and apply it to scoring multiplexed, phenotypic endpoints measured in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) across a broad concentration-response profile for a diverse set of 1060 chemicals. AggE accurately identified chemicals with significant morphological effects, including single-endpoint effects and multi-endpoint responses that would have been missed by univariate methods, while avoiding putative false-positives that confound traditional methods due to irregular correlation structure. By testing AggE in a variety of high-dimensional real and simulated datasets, we have characterized its performance and suggested implementation parameters that can guide its application across a wide range of experimental scenarios. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.orgilicensesiby-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available