4.5 Article

Precision measurement of the integrated luminosity of the data taken by BESIII at center-of-mass energies between 3.810 GeV and 4.600 GeV

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS C
Volume 39, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/9/093001

Keywords

precision measurement; luminosity; Bhabha scattering; charmonium

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2015CB856700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11125525, 11235011, 11322544, 11335008, 11425524]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Large-Scale Scientific Facility Program
  4. Joint Large-Scale Scientific Facility Fund of the NSFC [11179007, U1232201, U1332201]
  5. Joint Large-Scale Scientific Facility Fund of the CAS [11179007, U1232201, U1332201]
  6. CAS [KJCX2-YW-N29, KJCX2-YW-N45]
  7. 100 Talents Program of CAS
  8. INPAC
  9. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology
  10. German Research Foundation DFG (Collaborative Research Center) [CRC-1044]
  11. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Italy
  12. Ministry of Development of Turkey [DPT2006K-120470]
  13. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-07-91152]
  14. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-04ER41291, DE-FG02-05ER41374, DE-FG02-94ER40823, DESC0010118]
  15. U.S. National Science Foundation
  16. University of Groningen (RuG)
  17. Helmholtzzentrum fuer Schwerionenforschung GmbH (GSI), Darmstadt
  18. WCU Program of National Research Foundation of Korea [R32-2008-000-10155-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From December 2011 to May 2014, about 5 fb(-1) of data were taken with the BESIII detector at center-ofmass energies between 3.810 GeV and 4.600 GeV to study the charmonium-like states and higher excited charmonium states. The time-integrated luminosity of the collected data sample is measured to a precision of 1% by analyzing events produced by the large-angle Bhabha scattering process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available