4.4 Article

Carcinogenicity and mode of action evaluation for alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane: Implications for human health risk assessment

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 152-173

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.007

Keywords

Alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane; Hexachlorocyclohexane; Mode of action; Human relevance; Reference dose; Liver carcinogenesis; Nonlinear; Threshold; Dose-response

Funding

  1. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
  2. Honeywell
  3. Olin Corporation
  4. FMC Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane (alpha-HCH) is one of eight structural isomers that have been used worldwide as insecticides. Although no longer produced or used agriculturally in the United States, exposure to HCH isomers is of continuing concern due to legacy usage and persistence in the environment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies alpha-HCH as a probable human carcinogen and provides a slope factor of 6.3 (mg/kg-day)(-1) for the compound, based on hepatic nodules and hepatocellular carcinomas observed in male mice and derived using a default linear approach for modeling carcinogens. EPA's evaluation, last updated in 1993, does not consider more recently available guidance that allows for the incorporation of mode of action (MOA) for determining a compound's dose-response. Contrary to the linear approach assumed by EPA, the available data indicate that alpha-HCH exhibits carcinogenicity via an MOA that yields a nonlinear, threshold dose-response. In our analysis, we conducted an MOA evaluation and dose-response analysis for alpha-HCH induced liver carcinogenesis. We concluded that alpha-HCH causes liver tumors in rats and mice through an MOA involving increased promotion of cell growth, or mitogenesis. Based on these findings, we developed a threshold, cancer-based, reference dose (RfD) for alpha-HCH. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available