4.5 Article

Working across scales in integrated catchment management: lessons learned for adaptive water governance from regional experiences

Journal

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 1869-1880

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-016-0988-1

Keywords

Multi-level governance; Water user associations; Climate change; Civil society; Public policy

Funding

  1. Centre for Expertise for Waters (CREW)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integrated Catchment Management (ICM) has in recent years been promoted by a wealth of top-down'' government policies, while a number of bottom-up'' community-based initiatives have also been set up. At the same time, adaptive water governance, built around multi-level, integrative and participatory institutional arrangements, is called for in order to enhance adaptive capacity of social-ecological systems to global changes. Working across scales, aligning planning processes, and multi-actor collaboration are key issues in the linking of top-down and bottom-up ICM, hence providing insights into how adaptive water governance can work in practice. The paper presents a study of how ICM actors work across scales and reconcile national and local priorities in 15 regional experiences chosen to reflect a diversity of scales, histories and governance arrangements. It is complemented with an in-depth, illustrative example, taken from the Tweed River Basin in Scotland, where a local charity has gradually developed and helped bridge gaps between local communities and government. Research results present the ways in which trusted intermediaries'' can successfully close the gap across levels of governance, i.e. between communities, business, and governmental interests at multiple scales. Local trusted intermediaries'' perform well, with their local knowledge, at building rapport with key actors and effectuate change on the ground. The research also indicates the need for a legal framework, or at least an established policy structure, that acts to harness the good will and interests of local actors while improving implementation of broader, national objectives. There appears to be no specific mechanism for multi-level collaboration, although results indicate that more formal and coercive forms of partnership are necessary at later stages to ensure implementation, for example, via the establishment of formal duties on public bodies or legally binding agreements between ICM stakeholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Engineering, Civil

OECD Principles on Water Governance in practice: an assessment of existing frameworks in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Africa and South America

Susana Neto, Jeff Camkin, Andrew Fenemor, Poh-Ling Tan, Jaime Melo Baptista, Marcia Ribeiro, Roland Schulze, Sabine Stuart-Hill, Chris Spray, Rahmah Elfithri

WATER INTERNATIONAL (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk

Ruth Dittrich, Tom Ball, Anita Wreford, Dominic Moran, Chris J. Spray

JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (2019)

Article Ecology

Legal framing for achieving 'good ecological status' for Malaysian rivers: Are there lessons to be learned from the EU Water Framework Directive?

Rasyikah Md Khalid, Mazlin Bin Mokhtar, Faridah Jalil, Suhaimi Ab Rahman, Christopher Spray

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (2018)

Article Ecology

Getting into the water with the Ecosystem Services Approach: The DESSIN ESS evaluation framework

Gerardo Anzaldua, Nadine V. Gerner, Manuel Lago, Katrina Abhold, Mandy Hinzmann, Sarah Beyer, Caroline Winking, Niels Riegels, Jorgen Krogsgaard Jensen, Montserrat Termes, Jaume Amoroes, Kristina Wencki, Clemens Strehl, Rita Ugarelli, Marius Hasenheit, Issa Nafo, Marta Hernandez, Ester Vilanova, Sigrid Damman, Stijn Brouwer, Josselin Rouillard, David Schwesig, Sebastian Birk

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (2018)

Review Environmental Sciences

Ecosystem services bundles: challenges and opportunities for implementation and further research

Nada Saidi, Christopher Spray

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

Introducing the H2020 AQUACROSS project: Knowledge, Assessment, and Management for AQUAtic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services aCROSS EU policies

M. Lago, B. Boteler, J. Rouillard, K. Abhold, S. C. Jaehnig, A. Iglesias-Campos, G. Delacamara, G. J. Piet, T. Hein, A. J. A. Nogueira, A. I. Lillebo, P. Strosser, L. A. Robinson, A. De Wever, T. O'Higgins, M. Schluter, L. Torok, P. Reichert, C. van Hamo, F. Villa, McDonald Hugh

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT (2019)

Article Environmental Sciences

Protecting and restoring Europe's waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive

Laurence Carvalho, Eleanor B. Mackay, Ana Cristina Cardoso, Annette Baattrup-Pedersen, Sebastian Birk, Kirsty L. Blackstockf, Gabor Borics, Angel Borja, Christian K. Feld, Maria Teresa Ferreira, Lidija Globevnik, Bruna Grizzetti, Sarah Hendry, Daniel Hering, Martyn Kelly, Sindre Langaas, Kristian Meissner, Yiannis Panagopoulos, Ellis Penning, Josselin Rouillard, Sergi Sabater, Ursula Schmedtje, Bryan M. Spears, Markus Venohr, Wouter van de Bund, Anne Lyche Solheim

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT (2019)

Article Environmental Sciences

Transitioning out of Open Access: A Closer Look at Institutions for Management of Groundwater Rights in France, California, and Spain

J. Rouillard, C. Babbitt, M. Pulido-Velazquez, J-D Rinaudo

Summary: This study evaluates how users and public authorities can co-manage groundwater extraction by agriculture in France, Spain, and California. Different choices were made regarding user involvement in allocation decisions, showing the diversity of institutional arrangements influencing groundwater allocations in the three cases. The paper demonstrates the different ways in which comanagement may be made operational for managing agricultural groundwater use.

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Natural flood management, lag time and catchment scale: Results from an empirical nested catchment study

Andrew Black, Leo Peskett, Alan MacDonald, Andy Young, Chris Spray, Tom Ball, Huw Thomas, Alan Werritty

Summary: The study conducted in the Eddleston catchment over 9 years revealed that NFM interventions can significantly delay the hydrological response time in upstream catchments smaller than 26 km(2), while the effects are less pronounced in larger catchments and those treated with riparian planting alone.

JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (2021)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Initiating collective action for the management of deep confined aquifer systems: application of a participatory scenario approach in France

Josselin Rouillard, Noemie Neverre, Jean-Daniel Rinaudo

Summary: Large deep confined aquifer systems are crucial for water and food security as well as rural economic development, but there are few cases worldwide of integrated management and governance of such groundwater resources. Participatory scenario analysis can trigger collective action by regional actors, fostering a shared understanding of the resource and addressing groundwater management challenges.

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL (2022)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

A Framework to Evaluate the SDG Contribution of Fluvial Nature-Based Solutions

Tatiana Andrikopoulou, Ralph M. J. Schielen, Chris J. Spray, Cor A. Schipper, Astrid Blom

Summary: This study evaluates the contribution of fluvial NBSs to the UN 2030 Agenda through a four-step framework, with inputs from scientific literature and case studies. By applying fluvial flooding indicators to the Eddleston Water Project, it is found to contribute to 9 SDGs and 33 SDG targets, enhancing the link between the sustainability performance of NBSs and the UN 2030 Agenda.

SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Strategic Design and Delivery of Integrated Catchment Restoration Monitoring: Emerging Lessons from a 12-Year Study in the UK

Chris Spray, Andrew Black, David Bradley, Chris Bromley, Fiona Caithness, Jennifer Dodd, James Hunt, Alan MacDonald, Roberto Martinez Romero, Tommy McDermott, Hamish Moir, Lorraine Quinn, Helen Reid, Hamish Robertson

Summary: This paper reviews and evaluates the monitoring strategy of the Eddleston Water project in Scotland, exploring a comprehensive assessment of restoration success. The study finds the importance of conducting a scoping study and capturing a full range of environmental variables, and suggests lessons to inform other river rehabilitation monitoring programs.

WATER (2022)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Protecting aquatic biodiversity in Europe: How much do EU environmental policies support ecosystem-based management?

Josselin Rouillard, Manuel Lago, Katrina Abhold, Lina Roeschel, Terri Kafyeke, Verena Mattheiss, Helen Klimmek

AMBIO (2018)

Article Environmental Studies

Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity across the Freshwater, Coastal and Marine Realms: Is the existing EU policy framework fit for purpose?

Josselin Rouillard, Manuel Lago, Katrina Abhold, Lina Roeschel, Terri Kafyeke, Helen Klimmek, Verena Mattheiss

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE (2018)

No Data Available