4.7 Article

Phase I trial of vorinostat added to chemoradiation with capecitabine in pancreatic cancer

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 312-318

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.013

Keywords

HDAC inhibitor; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant therapy

Funding

  1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) - Merck Co., Inc.
  2. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center [P30CA68485, NCI U01CA142565, UL1TR000445]
  3. AUR GE Radiology Research Academic Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: This single institution phase I trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent vorinostat and capecitabine with radiation in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. Material and methods: Twenty-one patients received escalating doses of vorinostat (100-400 mg daily) during radiation. Capecitabine was given 1000 mg q12 on the days of radiation. Radiation consisted of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Vorinostat dose escalation followed the standard 3 + 3 design. No dose escalation beyond 400 mg vorinostat was planned. Diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI pre- and post-treatment was used to evaluate in vivo tumor cellularity. Results: The MTD of vorinostat was 400 mg. Dose limiting toxicities occurred in one patient each at dose levels 100 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg: 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and one thrombocytopenia. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (76%) and nausea (14%). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) increased in most tumors. Nineteen (90%) patients had stable disease, and two (10%) had progressive disease at time of surgery. Eleven patients underwent surgical exploration with four R0 resections and one R1 resection. Median overall survival was 1.1 years (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.35). Conclusions: The combination of vorinostat 400 mg daily M-F and capecitabine 1000 mg q12 M-F with radiation (30 Gy in 10 fractions) was well tolerated with encouraging median overall survival. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available