4.7 Article

Cancer cell motility is affected through 3D cell culturing and SCF/c-Kit pathway but not by X-irradiation

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 537-543

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.036

Keywords

X-irradiation; Cancer cell motility; 3D cell culture; SCF/c-Kit pathway; siRNA

Funding

  1. Anneliese-Pohl Stiftung e.V.
  2. von-Rontgen-Behring Stiftung e.V.
  3. Verein fur Krebsforschung am Standort Giessen e.V.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: Success of radiotherapy is often limited by therapy resistance and metastasis resulting from cancer cell motility. It was tested in vitro whether this cancer cell motility is affected by growth condition, active SCF/c-Kit pathway or X-irradiation. Materials and methods: Cell motility was measured with BioCoat (TM) Matrigel (TM) invasion chamber using four different cancer cell lines (NSCLC: H23, H520, H226 and PrCa: DU145). Cells were grown in 2D or 3D, SCF was knocked down by siRNA and cells were irradiated with 2 or 6 Gy. Results: All cell lines except H520 showed a 2-3-fold increase in cell motility when grown in 3D. This effect was considered to result from the EMT-like change seen when cells were grown in 3D as indicated by the enhanced expression of vimentin and N-cadherin and reduction of E-cadherin. Just the opposite trends were found for H520 cells. Knockdown of SCF was found to result in reduced cell motility for both 2D and 3D. In contrast, X-irradiation did not modulate cell motility neither under 2D nor 3D. In line with this, X-irradiation did neither induce the expression of EMT-associated genes nor SCF. Conclusion: X-irradiation affects neither the expression of important EMT genes such as vimentin, E-cadherin and N-cadherin nor SCF/c-Kit signaling and, as a consequence, does not alter cell motility. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available