BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 20, Issue 04, Pages 598-607
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Online
2016-10-13
DOI
10.1017/s1368980016002743
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Applying Recovery Biomarkers to Calibrate Self-Report Measures of Energy and Protein in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos
- (2015) Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Invited Commentary: Dietary Misreporting as a Potential Source of Bias in Diet-Disease Associations: Future Directions in Nutritional Epidemiology Research
- (2015) M. A. Mendez AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Comparison of Methods to Account for Implausible Reporting of Energy Intake in Epidemiologic Studies
- (2015) Jinnie J. Rhee et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Pooled Results From 5 Validation Studies of Dietary Self-Report Instruments Using Recovery Biomarkers for Potassium and Sodium Intake
- (2015) L. S. Freedman et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake
- (2015) Laura Trijsburg et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
- Evaluation of calculated energy and macronutrient contents of diets provided in controlled dietary intervention trials by chemical analysis of duplicate portions
- (2015) E. Siebelink et al. JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
- Pooled Results From 5 Validation Studies of Dietary Self-Report Instruments Using Recovery Biomarkers for Energy and Protein Intake
- (2014) Laurence S. Freedman et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Simultaneous Association of Total Energy Consumption and Activity-Related Energy Expenditure With Risks of Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Diabetes Among Postmenopausal Women
- (2014) Cheng Zheng et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Factors relating to eating style, social desirability, body image and eating meals at home increase the precision of calibration equations correcting self-report measures of diet using recovery biomarkers: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative
- (2013) Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani et al. Nutrition Journal
- Relative validity of the food frequency questionnaire used to assess dietary intake in the Leiden Longevity Study
- (2013) Martinette T Streppel et al. Nutrition Journal
- Alternative Methods of Accounting for Underreporting and Overreporting When Measuring Dietary Intake-Obesity Relations
- (2011) Michelle A. Mendez et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Dietary reporting errors on 24 h recalls and dietary questionnaires are associated with BMI across six European countries as evaluated with recovery biomarkers for protein and potassium intake
- (2011) Heinz Freisling et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
- Self-reported energy intake by FFQ compared with actual energy intake to maintain body weight in 516 adults
- (2011) Els Siebelink et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
- Bias in protein and potassium intake collected with 24-h recalls (EPIC-Soft) is rather comparable across European populations
- (2011) Sandra P. Crispim et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
- Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons
- (2009) Mazda Jenab et al. HUMAN GENETICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started