4.2 Article

Test-retest reproducibility of extrastriatal binding with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in healthy male subjects

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages 10-15

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.10.007

Keywords

I-123-FP-CIT; Serotonin transporter; Midbrain; Cortex; SPECT; Reproducibility

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K09841]
  2. Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [H25-51]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K09841] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

I-123-labeled 2 beta-carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl) nortropane (I-123-FP-CIT) is used to assess striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) expression, but it can also quantify extrastriatal serotonin transporter (SERT) expressions. While FP-CIT uptake in extrastriatal regions has been quantified, no information exists on the reproducibility of the I-123-FP-CIT specific uptake ratio (SUR) in extrastriatal regions. We investigated test-retest reproducibility of I-123-FP-CIT binding in the striatum, the midbrain, and cortical regions in eight healthy male subjects. All subjects underwent two I-123-FP-CIT SPECT scans, and SUR was calculated using the cerebellum as the reference. We found good test-retest reproducibility of I-123-FP-CIT SUR in the midbrain, and in the lateral frontal/temporal cortex and combined cortical regions. The overall variability and intraclass correlation of SUR were, respectively, 4.9-7.8% and 0.90-0.96 in striatal regions, 8.6% and 0.79 in the midbrain, and 3.6-9.1% and 0.84-0.95 in the lateral frontal/temporal cortex and combined cortical regions. Our results provide evidence that I-123-FP-CIT SPECT is a valid technique for analyzing striatal DAT, as well as extrastriatal SERT in areas such as the SERT-enriched midbrain. In addition, our data suggest that I-123-FP-CIT could be used for analyzing SERT in regions with relatively low SERT expression (e.g., temporal or frontal cortices).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available