4.2 Article

Memory and functional brain differences in a national sample of US veterans with Gulf War Illness

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages 33-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.03.004

Keywords

Gulf War Illness; Associative memory; fMRI; Encoding

Funding

  1. IDIQ [VA549-P-0027]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, TX, U.S.
  3. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [DAMD17-01-1-0741]
  4. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1RR024982]
  5. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Roughly 26-32% of U.S. veterans who served in the 1991 Persian Gulf War report suffering from chronic health problems. Memory complaints are regularly reported by ill Gulf War veterans (GWV), but limited data verify their complaints. This study investigated episodic memory and brain function in a nationally representative sample of GWV, using a face-name memory task and functional magnetic resonance imaging during encoding. A syndrome classification system was used to subdivide ill GWV into the three major Gulf War Illness syndrome types, impaired cognition (GWV-1), confusion ataxia (GWV-2), and central pain (GWV-3). Memory and brain function of ill GWV were contrasted to deployed and non deployed well GWV controls (GWV-C). Ill GWV exhibited impaired memory function relative to GWV-C but the patterns of functional brain differences varied. Brain activation differentiated the GWV-C from the ill GWV. The different syndrome types also differed from one another in several brain regions. Additionally, the current study was the first to observe differences in brain function between deployed and nondeployed GWV-C. These results provide (1) evidence of memory impairment in ill GWV and differentiate the syndrome types at a functional neurobiological level, and (2) the role of deployment in the war on brain function. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available