4.7 Article

Dysregulation of visual motion inhibition in major depression

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages 214-221

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.028

Keywords

Cognitive; Neuroscience; Motion; Vision; Center surround; Depression; Psychophysics; Mood

Categories

Funding

  1. Rossano family
  2. McLean Hospital
  3. NRSA Grant [F31 NS074682]
  4. NIH research Grant [R01 MH 096793]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals with depression show depleted concentrations of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA in occipital (visual) cortex, predicting weakened inhibition within their visual systems. Yet, visual inhibition in depression remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, we examined the inhibitory process of center surround suppression (CSS) of visual motion in depressed individuals. Perceptual performance in discriminating the direction of motion was measured as a function of stimulus presentation time and contrast in depressed individuals (n=27) and controls (n=22). CSS was operationalized as the accuracy difference between conditions using large (7.5 degrees) and small (1.5 degrees) grating stimuli. Both depressed and control participants displayed the expected advantage in accuracy for small stimuli at high contrast. A significant interaction emerged between subject group, contrast level and presentation time, indicating that alterations of CSS in depression were modulated by stimulus conditions. At high contrast, depressed individuals showed significantly greater CSS than controls at the 66 ms presentation time (where the effect peaked in both groups). The results' specificity and dependence on stimulus features such as contrast, size and presentation time suggest that they arise from changes in early visual processing, and are not the results of a generalized deficit or cognitive bias. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available