4.7 Article

Prevalence and implications of Truman symptoms in subjects at ultra high risk for psychosis

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 238, Issue -, Pages 270-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.001

Keywords

At risk mental state; Psychosis; Anomalous self experiences; Truman symptoms; Depersonalization; Derealization

Categories

Funding

  1. Maudsley Philosophy Group Small Grant
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. MRC [G0700995, MC_U120097115] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [1116129, MC_U120097115, G0700995] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preliminary qualitative research has suggested that patients with early stages of psychosis and those at Ultra High Risk (UHR) may experience Truman symptoms (TS). This study is an exploratory investigation of TS in a sample of 26 UHR subjects and 14 matched controls (HC) recruited from three prodromal and early intervention clinics and its relation with clinical features, depersonalization and basic self-disturbances. The UHR were assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (CDS) and the Examination of Anomalous Self Experiences (EASE) checklist. In our sample, TS were specific (TS absent in HC) and highly prevalent (50%) in UHR subjects. We found a significant difference in EASE total scores across HC, UHR with TS and without TS but post-hoc analyses showed similar scores in the two latter groups. The presence of TS in our UHR sample was associated with significant higher PANSS general psychopathology but with non-significant difference in the CAARMS, CDS and SOFAS scores. This study of TS in UHR subjects suggested that they might be prevalent and specific of this population. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available