4.1 Article

Revisiting antibody modeling assessment for CDR-H3 loop

Journal

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 477-484

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzw028

Keywords

antibody; CDR-H3 loop; multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation; free energy landscape; crystal packing

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16K07331]
  2. JSPS [24118008, 16K14711]
  3. Cooperative Research Program of the Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University [CR-15-05]
  4. HPCI [hp150146]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K14711, 24118001, 16K07331, 24118008] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The antigen-binding site of antibodies, also known as complementarity-determining region (CDR), has hypervariable sequence properties. In particular, the third CDR loop of the heavy chain, CDR-H3, has such variability in its sequence, length, and conformation that ordinary modeling techniques cannot build a high-quality structure. At Stage 2 of the Second Antibody Modeling Assessment (AMA-II) held in 2013, the model structures of the CDR-H3 loops were submitted by the seven modelers and were critically assessed. After our participation in AMA-II, we rebuilt one of the long CDR-H3 loops with 13 residues (A52 antibody) by a more precise method, using enhanced conformational sampling with the explicit water model, as compared to our previous method employed at AMA-II. The current stable models obtained from the free energy landscape at 300 K include structures similar to the X-ray crystal structures. Those models were not built in our previous work at AMA-II. The current free energy landscape suggested that the CDR-H3 loop structures in the crystal are not stable in solution, but they are stabilized by the crystal packing effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available