4.6 Article

High-cell-density cultivation and recombinant protein production with Komagataella pastoris in stirred-tank bioreactors from milliliter to cubic meter scale

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 177-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.11.024

Keywords

Miniaturized stirred-tank bioreactors; Pichia pastoris; High-cell-density cultivation; Candida antarctica lipase B2 variant (CaL-B2); Continuous methanol feeding; Scale-up

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-cell-density cultivations (HCDC) with methylotrophic yeasts need continuous methanol feeding at controlled process conditions. However, none of the miniaturized bioreactor systems in use for screening studies facilitates continuous feeding. Hence, continuous feeding of methanol in pH-controlled parallel stirred-tank bioreactors on a milliliter scale was ensured by supplying air with varying methanol concentrations in the gas phase. The gas-liquid methanol transfer rates were characterized as a function of the operating conditions. Methanol feeding rates of up to 5.3 g L-1 h(-1) were possible without oxygen limitation at the chosen process conditions. HCDC processes with 50-60 g L-1 cell dry weight within 49-69 h were established on the milliliter scale with extracellular production of Candida antarctica lipase B2 variant (CaL-B2) as an example (16,604 U L-1). The scalability was demonstrated by transferring the Komagataella pastoris HCDC processes to the liter and cubic meter scale with the maximum oxygen transfer rate as the scale-up criterion. Biomass concentrations and lipase activities were the same at all scales within the estimation error. Thus, parallel-operated stirred-tank bioreactors on a milliliter scale with continuous methanol feeding via the gas phase will reduce the time and cost of screening methylotrophic yeast strains and cultivation conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available